Integrated Inspection by the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education of St. Peter’s Primary School Nursery Class
Renfrewshire Council

10 December 2003

The Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act, 2001, requires that the Care Commission inspect all care services covered by the Act every year to monitor the quality of care provided. In accordance with the Act, the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education carry out integrated inspections of the quality of care and education. In doing this, inspection teams take account of National Care Standards, Early Education and Childcare up to the age of 16, and The Child at the Centre. The following standards and related quality indicators were used in the recent inspection.

National Care Standard

Child at the Centre Quality Indicator

Standard 2 — A Safe Environment

Resources

Standard 4 — Engaging with Children

Development and learning through play

Standard 5 — Quality of Experience

Curriculum
Children’s development and learning

Standard 6 — Support and Development

Support for children and families

Standard 14 — Well-managed Service

Management, Leadership and Quality Assurance

Evaluations made using HMIE quality indicators use the following scale, and these words are used in the report to describe the team’s judgements:

Very good:

major strengths

Good:

strengths outweigh weaknesses

Fair:

some important weaknesses

Unsatisfactory:

major weaknesses

Reports contain Recommendations which are intended to support improvements in the quality of service.

Any Requirements refer to actions which must be taken by service providers to ensure that regulations are met and there is compliance with relevant legislation. In these cases the regulation(s) to which requirements refer will be noted clearly and timescales given.

HOW TO CONTACT US

Copies of this report have been sent to the headteacher, staff and the Director of Education and Leisure. Copies are also available on the Care Commission website: www.carecommission.com and HMIE website: www.hmie.gov.uk .

Should you wish to comment on or make a complaint about any aspect of the inspection or about this report you should write either to the Care Commission or to HM Inspectorate of Education at the address below. If you are still dissatisfied with our services, you can contact your member of the Scottish Parliament (or, if you prefer, any other MSP). You can also contact the Scottish Parliamentary Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is fully independent and has powers to investigate complaints about Government departments and Agencies.

Complaints Co-ordinator
Headquarters
Care Commission
Compass House
Riverside Drive
Dundee
DD1 4NY

Hazel Dewart
HM Inspectorate of Education
Saughton House
Broomhouse Drive
EDINBURGH
EH11 3XD

Crown Copyright 2003
Care Commission
HM Inspectorate of Education

This report may be reproduced in whole or in part, except for commercial purposes or in connection with a prospectus or advertisement, provided that the source and date thereof are stated.

Integrated Inspection by the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education of St. Peter’s Primary School Nursery Class Renfrewshire Council

Introduction

St. Peter’s Primary School Nursery Class was inspected in September 2003 as part of the integrated inspection programme by the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education. An inspection of the primary school was carried out at the same time by HMIE and is the subject of a separate report. The nursery catered for children from age three to five years. At the time of the inspection the roll was 37.

The environment

The nursery was set within two former classrooms of St Peter’s primary school. The accommodation was secure and suitable to meet the needs of the children. Both playrooms were bright, clean, stimulating and comfortable. The layout of the nursery allowed the children to play independently, and also to meet in both small and large groups. Staff made effective use of the available space inside and outside the premises.

Equipment was observed to be clean and well maintained, and staff had taken steps to control the spread of infection. The nursery had neither an access ramp nor a disabled toilet. The education authority was committed to provide both of these facilities and had an ongoing programme to address them.

Quality of children’s experience

Relationships between staff and children were very good. Staff had a sound knowledge of children’s development and learning. They intervened effectively to support and extend children’s learning. Staff had very good procedures for planning children’s experiences. Observations and records were detailed and used well to monitor progress. Next steps in learning were clearly identified and taken into account in planning. Staff kept parents well informed about their children’s progress. Information was shared, as appropriate, with other agencies.

Staff provided a range of stimulating activities in the key aspects of children’s development and learning. There was a good balance of activities chosen by children and those directed by adults. Children were well motivated and concentrated for extended periods of time. They played happily by themselves or together.

Support for children and families

Staff knew children very well and provided effective support for them and their families. Relationships with parents were very good. Parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the service.

Parents and carers had regular opportunities to talk informally with staff. They were informed about the work of the nursery, and also about their child’s progress, through informal communication and more formal consultation. The depute head teacher liaised with outside agencies to provide support for children with special educational needs.

Management

The nursery was very well led. The depute head teacher demonstrated effective leadership qualities and communication skills. She was strongly committed to the nursery and shared her vision for its future development with staff. She was well organised, approachable and highly respected by parents.

The nursery had a comprehensive range of policies and procedures, which were accessible to staff and parents. However, the depute head teacher should now review systems for formally recording accidents and incidents.

Staff were well deployed and worked hard to develop the quality of the service. The nursery had effective recruitment procedures in place to ensure the safety of children. The nursery was appropriately staffed. All staff were qualified and were continuing to develop their knowledge, skills and experiences through attending a range of appropriate training courses.

Key strengths

Recommendations for improvement

Care Commission Officers and HM Inspectors have asked the pre-school centre and Education Authority to prepare an action plan indicating how they will address the main findings of the report. Where requirements are made, the action plan should include timescales to deal with these. The plan will be available to parents and carers. In liaison with the pre-school centre and Education Authority, Care Commission Officers and HM Inspectors will monitor progress to ensure improvements are in line with the main findings of the report.

Mandy Ross
Care Commission

Alison Watson
HM Inspectorate of Education