16 March 2005
Auldearn Primary School Nursery Class
Manse Road
Auldearn
Nairn
IV12 5SX
The Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act, 2001, requires that the Care Commission inspect all care services covered by the Act every year to monitor the quality of care provided. In accordance with the Act, the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education carry out integrated inspections of the quality of care and education. In doing this, inspection teams take account of National Care Standards, Early Education and Childcare up to the age of 16, and The Child at the Centre. The following standards and related quality indicators were used in the recent inspection.
National Care Standard |
Child at the Centre Quality Indicator |
Standard 2 — A Safe Environment |
Resources |
Standard 4 — Engaging with Children |
Development and learning through play |
Standard 5 — Quality of Experience |
Curriculum |
Standard 6 — Support and Development |
Support for children and families |
Standard 14 — Well-managed Service |
Management, Leadership and Quality |
Evaluations made using HMIE quality indicators use the following scale, and these words are used in the report to describe the team’s judgements:
Very good |
: major strengths |
Good |
: strengths outweigh weaknesses |
Fair |
: some important weaknesses |
Unsatisfactory |
: major weaknesses |
Reports contain Recommendations which are intended to support improvements in the quality of service.
Any Requirements refer to actions which must be taken by service providers to ensure that regulations are met and there is compliance with relevant legislation. In these cases the regulation(s) to which requirements refer will be noted clearly and timescales given.
HOW TO CONTACT US
Copies of this report have been sent to the headteacher, staff and the education authority. Copies are also available on the Care Commission website: www.carecommission.com and HMIE website: www.hmie.gov.uk .
Should you wish to comment on or make a complaint about any aspect of the inspection or about this report you should write either to the Care Commission or to HM Inspectorate of Education at the address below. If you are still dissatisfied with our services, you can contact your member of the Scottish Parliament (or, if you prefer, any other MSP). You can also contact the Scottish Parliamentary Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is fully independent and has powers to investigate complaints about Government departments and Agencies.
Complaints Coordinator |
Hazel Dewart |
Crown Copyright 2005
Care Commission
HM Inspectorate of Education
This report may be reproduced in whole or in part, except for commercial purposes or in connection with a prospectus or advertisement, provided that the source and date thereof are stated.
Introduction
Auldearn Primary School Nursery Class was inspected in November 2004 as part of the integrated inspection programme by the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education. An inspection of the primary school was carried out at the same time by HMIE and is the subject of a separate report. The nursery catered for pre-school children aged three to five years. At the time of the inspection the roll was 32.
The environment
Standard 2
The nursery was situated within the primary school but with a separate entrance. Entry systems to the nursery and from the playroom into school were safe and secure. The nursery consisted of an entrance area, toilet and playroom. Children were cared for in a safe, hygienic, pleasant and attractive environment. Staff used space effectively and the layout of the playroom allowed children to play independently or in a group.
The nursery had an outdoor play area leading from the nursery entrance. This area was not fully enclosed and was a direct route for all visitors to the school. The nursery also used the school gym and a large school playground with grassed and tarmac areas. These were some distance away and accessed through the primary school. While staff were vigilant, improvements needed to be made to the outdoor area to enable more secure usage. The headteacher should further develop risk assessments for the nursery.
There was a good range of resources. Play equipment was clean and well maintained. Staff took appropriate measures to control the spread of infection. Staff should continue to develop cleaning and maintenance schedules. Policies and procedures were in place to ensure children did not have access to inappropriate materials, including safe use of the internet.
Quality of children’s experience
Standard 4 & 5
Staff knew children well and had formed very positive relationships with them. They interacted effectively with children using praise and encouragement to develop their confidence and self esteem. Children were confident, interested, cooperative and concentrated well in the welcoming and caring learning environment. Staff should make more effective use of questioning to challenge and extend children’s learning.
Staff planned a broad and balanced range of themed activities to promote children’s learning and development. These were sufficiently flexible to take account of children’s interests. Staff made regular observations of children at play and compiled individual and group assessment records and folios of children’s work. However, they had identified the need to develop planning and had recently introduced new procedures. Staff should ensure the revised approach is manageable, clearly identifies what children are expected to learn and makes effective use of assessment information to plan the next steps in children’s learning.
Parents had good formal and informal opportunities to share information about children with staff. Parents received informative annual written reports on children’s progress.
Features of the programmes for children included the following.
Support for children and families
Standard 6
The nursery gave good support to children and their families. Staff had established very positive relationships with children and parents. They were responsive and supportive in meeting their differing needs and circumstances. Parents received an informative handbook and regular newsletters, detailing nursery practice and events. The notice board provided information on staff, planning, snack, activities and community resources. Parents were invited to make suggestions about the nursery. Parents supported the nursery through the parents’ association, helping on outings and taking part in events. Parents who responded to the pre-inspection questionnaire were very satisfied with the provision made by the nursery. A few wanted further opportunities to work in partnership.
The nursery had good arrangement for transition. Parents and children made prior visits and shared information with staff before children started nursery. P1 staff made several visits to the nursery and children experienced a supported playtime and spent a session in the P1 class. A ‘buddy’ system, where older pupils took responsibility for new entrants, helped ensure a smooth transition. There was good contact with other early years provision and schools. Staff should refine procedures and compile a transition policy and share it with parents. Information was shared with parents, staff and other agency personnel who were involved with children requiring additional support in their learning, when applicable.
Management
Standard 14
The headteacher, with overall responsibility, viewed the nursery as an important part of the school. She had formed positive relations with staff and parents and was found by them to be approachable and supportive. Day-to-day management of the nursery had been delegated to the nursery coordinator teacher and two nursery nurses. Staff were motivated and had good cooperative working relationships. They took good account of the changes in staffing and part-time working. However, to ensure clarity, efficiency and effectiveness, the headteacher and staff should review and document roles and responsibilities. The role of management should be more fully explained to parents.
A wide range of appropriate policies and procedures had been developed to ensure the smooth running of the nursery. All staff had been trained in child protection policy and procedures and followed the local authority guidelines. The headteacher had limited knowledge of the Scottish Social Service Council Codes of Practice and should access further information. Staff needed to revise procedures for recording accidents and the management of medication to keep parents fully informed. A staff review and development programme was in place and staff attended training to develop their skills.
Staff showed commitment to the development of the nursery and a development plan was improving aspects of provision. However, the process of self-evaluation in the nursery was at an early stage. The headteacher needed to formalise procedures and ensure more robust systems for monitoring all aspects of the work of the nursery with staff.
Key strengths
Other Issues
Response to recommendations or to requirements made at previous inspection
There had been limited action taken on the previous recommendation on improving the outdoor play area and this now becomes a requirement.
Recommendations for improvement
Requirements
Care Commission Officers and HM Inspectors have asked the pre-school centre and education authority to prepare an action plan indicating how they will address the main findings of the report. Where requirements are made, the action plan should include timescales to deal with these. The plan will be available to parents and carers. In liaison with the pre-school centre and education authority, Care Commission Officers and HM Inspectors will monitor progress to ensure improvements are in line with the main findings of the report.
John Rushforth |
Gillian Milne |
Care Commission |
HM Inspectorate of Education |