Integrated Inspection by the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education of
Rosebank Primary School Nursery Class
The Highland Council

21 September 2005

Rosebank Primary School Nursery Class
Lodgehill Road
Nairn
IV12 4RB

The Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act, 2001, requires that the Care Commission inspect all care services covered by the Act every year to monitor the quality of care provided. In accordance with the Act, the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education carry out integrated inspections of the quality of care and education. In doing this, inspection teams take account of National Care Standards, Early Education and Childcare up to the age of 16, and The Child at the Centre. The following standards and related quality indicators were used in the recent inspection.

National Care Standard

Child at the Centre Quality Indicator

Standard 2 — A Safe Environment

Resources

Standard 4 — Engaging with Children

Development and learning through play

Standard 5 — Quality of Experience

Curriculum
Children’s development and learning

Standard 6 — Support and Development

Support for children and families

Standard 14 — Well-managed Service

Management, Leadership and Quality Assurance

Evaluations made using HMIE quality indicators use the following scale, and these words are used in the report to describe the team’s judgements:

Very good : major strengths
Good : strengths outweigh weaknesses
Fair : some important weaknesses
Unsatisfactory : major weaknesses

Reports contain Recommendations which are intended to support improvements in the quality of service.

Any Requirements refer to actions which must be taken by service providers to ensure that regulations are met and there is compliance with relevant legislation. In these cases the regulation(s) to which requirements refer will be noted clearly and timescales given.

HOW TO CONTACT US

Copies of this report have been sent to the headteacher, staff and the education authority. Copies are also available on the Care Commission website: www.carecommission.com and HMIE website: www.hmie.gov.uk.

Should you wish to comment on or make a complaint about any aspect of the inspection or about this report you should write either to the Care Commission or to HM Inspectorate of Education at the address below. If you are still dissatisfied with our services, you can contact your member of the Scottish Parliament (or, if you prefer, any other MSP). You can also contact the Scottish Parliamentary Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is fully independent and has powers to investigate complaints about Government departments and Agencies.

Complaints Coordinator
Headquarters
Care Commission
Compass House
Riverside Drive
Dundee
DD1 4NY

Hazel Dewart
HM Inspectorate of Education
Denholm House
Almondvale Business Park
Almondvale Way
Livingston
EH54 6GA

Crown Copyright 2005
Care Commission
HM Inspectorate of Education

This report may be reproduced in whole or in part, except for commercial purposes or in connection with a prospectus or advertisement, provided that the source and date thereof are stated.

Introduction

Rosebank Primary School Nursery Class was inspected in May 2005 as part of the integrated inspection programme by the Care Commission and HM Inspectorate of Education. The nursery catered for pre-school children aged three to five years. At the time of the inspection the roll was 58.

The environment

Standard 2

The nursery was located within Rosebank Primary School. The children had access to a large playroom and occasional access to a smaller playroom. Staff had worked effectively to provide a stimulating, bright and welcoming environment. There were attractive displays of photographs and children’s work and a wide range of appropriate equipment and materials to support children’s learning. Children had opportunities to play and work independently or in groups.

Staff made sure that children did not have access to inappropriate materials, including screening access to the internet. Staff took appropriate measures to control the spread of infection. Toilet facilities were appropriate. The water temperature in the large playroom was not regulated to a safe temperature.

The children had access to an outdoor play area adjacent to the nursery. A section of the play area which was not enclosed was beside an access road to the school. This presented an unacceptable risk to the children.

Quality of children’s experience

Standard 4 & 5

Staff had very good relationships with the children and knew them well. They chose resources to meet the needs and interests of the children. Staff engaged them in high-quality interaction to promote thinking and develop their learning. Children had a good balance of free play and group activities. They had very good opportunities to express their creativity using a wide range of arts and crafts materials. They enjoyed experiences which encouraged them to use all their senses to explore their environment. The children were given the time and space to enjoy and explore a range of activities. They were challenged, stimulated and actively involved in the learning process. Children were enthusiastic and well motivated by tasks which were well matched to their interests and needs.

Staff maintained folios of children’s work and recorded their achievements. They were developing procedures for planning, assessment and reporting. They observed children at play and noted their progress. Staff now needed to make better use of this information to plan the next steps in children’s learning more effectively and more clearly track children’s progress in their learning and development.

Features of the programmes for children included the following.

Support for children and families

Standard 6

Staff were responsive to the children’s needs and those of their families. Parents were able to talk to staff daily and they had formal and informal opportunities to discuss their children’s progress. Parents were consulted through questionnaires about the work of the nursery. The parents who returned the pre-inspection questionnaire were positive about the work of the nursery. Some would have liked more information on their child’s progress.

The staff had a good knowledge of the children. They needed to use assessment information to plan more fully to meet the needs of some children. Staff knew the procedures for working with other agencies and would contact them if appropriate. There was a good induction programme to ensure a smooth transition from the nursery class to P1. Staff gave the pre-school children good opportunities to meet their next teacher. They had good links with local playgroups.

Management

Standard 14

The nursery was managed effectively. The senior management team valued the commitment of nursery staff highly. Parents and children were encouraged to make a full contribution to the life and work of the nursery. Records, plans and policies were properly made and kept in accordance with national and local guidance.

Communication between the senior management team and the nursery staff was limited, partly due to lack of regular meetings with nursery staff. Nursery staff were not effectively supported by the management team due to poor communication.

The senior management team did not monitor effectively the quality of work of each member of staff and the service as a whole.

Key strengths

Recommendations for improvement

Requirements

Care Commission Officers and HM Inspectors have asked the pre-school centre and education authority to prepare an action plan indicating how they will address the main findings of the report. Where requirements are made, the action plan should include timescales to deal with these. The plan will be available to parents and carers. In liaison with the pre-school centre and education authority Care Commission Officers and HM Inspectors will monitor progress to ensure improvements are in line with the main findings of the report.

Lee Gordon

Gail Simcox

Care Commission

HM Inspectorate of Education