Our performance against strategic priorities
Strategic Priority 1
Undertake a planned programme of independent evaluations, investigations into key aspects of education and publication of subsequent reports.
|
|
exceeded |
|
fully met |
|
|
|
partially met |
|
|
not met |
|
What we planned to do |
What we did |
|
1.1 Work towards the delivery of the generational cycle of inspections whereby all primary schools are being inspected on a seven year cycle by 2009 and all secondary schools are being inspected on a six year cycle by 2008, inspecting a minimum of 220 primary schools, 43 secondary and 24 special schools in 2003-04. |
|
|
1.2 Carry out a planned and balanced inspection and review programme including a minimum 12 FE college and subject reviews; community learning and development in eight local areas; and seven education authorities. |
|
|
1.3 Undertake a minimum of 400 inspections of early education centres; two inspections of secure accommodation services; and 15 inspections of residential special schools in collaboration with the Care Commission. |
|
|
1.4 Agree a Memorandum of Understanding and detailed administrative arrangements with the Care Commission by December 2003. |
|
|
1.5 Issue draft reports to 95% of schools within 16 working weeks of notification of the inspection and publish 92% of the final reports within 20 working weeks. |
|
|
1.6 Issue draft reports to all FE colleges within 8 working weeks from the end of the college review and publish all reports on dates stated in the published service level agreement with SFEFC. |
|
|
1.7 Issue 90% of draft reports to services responsible for community learning and development within 16 working weeks of notification of the inspection and publish 90% of reports within 24 working weeks. |
|
|
1.8 Have 85% of reports on education authorities ready for final publication within 12 weeks of concluding the inspection. |
|
|
1.9 Complete follow-through process working with schools and education authorities as appropriate in 90% of schools within two years of publication of initial inspection report. |
|
|
1.10 Undertake 90% of community learning and development follow-up inspections within two years of publication of the initial report. |
|
|
1.11 Undertake follow-ups to subject and college reviews of FE colleges as determined by SFEFC. |
|
|
1.12 Undertake all education authority interim follow-up inspections within 1 year of publication of the initial report and all other education authority follow-up inspections within 2 years. |
|
|
1.13 Undertake agreed investigations requested by Scottish Ministers or other bodies within agreed time-scales. |
|
Strategic Priority 2
Manage and develop the collation and analysis of evidence from evaluations
and the productive relationships with key stakeholders to enable HMIE to be
well informed and to identify and promote best practice.
|
What we planned to do |
What we did |
|
2.1 Publish reports in our "improving" series, including improving education authorities and improving success in P7-S2. |
|
|
2.2 Disseminate good practice on key sectors and aspects of education through seminars and other media, including follow-up to Standards and Quality pre-school report; effective practice in drugs education; a review of the development of Integrated Community Schools; aspects of provision in FE; a review of provision for out of school care and learning; a report on the implementation of the Better Behaviour-Better Learning report; a review of approaches to promoting race equality in schools; a joint conference with Learning and Teaching Scotland on effective use of curriculum flexibility; and a conference to promote discussion of the issues and good practice relating to Count us in. |
|
|
2.3 Publish aspect reports on FE as required in the published service level agreement with SFEFC. |
|
|
2.4 Publish report on aspects of youth work in community learning and development by October 2003. |
|
|
2.5 Publish guides in our self-evaluation series, including Sensitive Health Issues, Achieving Charter Mark in schools, Curriculum Flexibility, Citizenship and Mainstreaming. |
|
|
2.6 Develop advice on using quality indicators for evaluating Enterprise in Education and begin pilot, leading to final version in 2004-05. |
|
Strategic Priority 3
Ensure the timeous provision of high quality, independent professional
advice to the Scottish Ministers and others.
|
What we planned to do |
What we did |
|
3.1 Provide Scottish Ministers, relevant departments of the Scottish Executive and key national bodies with high quality advice within agreed time-scales, including undertaking the following activities. Provide advice to the Scottish Executive Education Department and others on the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
We provided a section on ICT in learning and teaching for the annual Scottish NGfL report. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide advice to working groups and other fora including: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 Undertake an agreed number of investigations of appeals concerning the terms of Records of Needs and complete these investigations, providing the Scottish Executive Education Department with reports of high quality. |
|
|
3.3 Complete evaluation activity in relation to ICT training provision for school teachers and librarians by December 2003, in line with service level agreement agreed with the New Opportunities Fund. |
|
Strategic Priority 4
Develop and maintain high quality services in all aspects of HMIE's activities,
making efficient and effective use of resources.
|
What we planned to do |
What we did |
|
4.1 Develop and publish a Corporate Plan for 2004-2007. |
|
|
4.2 Review the Agency Framework Document. |
|
|
4.3 Deliver HMIE's Corporate Learning Plan for calendar year 2003, including training on equality and fairness and new proportionate inspection models. |
|
|
4.4 Produce HMIE's Corporate Learning Plan for Calendar Year 2004. Prepare for Investors in People re-assessment. |
|
|
4.5 Implement the agreed projects for 2003-04 within HMIE Communications strategy. |
|
|
4.6 Extend the HMIE website by launching an area to disseminate good practice and by extending the availability of attainment data to schools. |
|
|
4.7 Continue the phased introduction of the new computer system for planning and monitoring HMIE activities. |
|
|
4.8 Maintain and develop the HMIE risk register. |
|
|
4.9 Recruit, train, manage and deploy lay members. |
We deployed all new lay members on inspections soon after training. A number of lay members with previous experience in schools were retrained for further education and community learning and development, and are now being deployed successfully. |
|
4.10 Recruit, train, manage and deploy Associate Assessors. |
|
|
4.11 Implement improvements to INEA inspections taking account of recommendations made by INEA Review Group in 2003. |
|
|
4.12 Introduce new primary inspection model by August 2003. |
|
|
4.13 Introduce a new special educational needs inspection model by August 2003. |
|
|
4.14 Implement new secondary inspection model by January 2004. |
|
|
4.15 Implement from August 2003 new proportionate follow-through arrangements. |
|
|
4.16 Introduce new statistics support package for primary inspections. |
|
|
4.17 Implement the action points for 2003-04 contained in the HMIE Race Equality Scheme. |
|
|
4.18 Complete the accommodation review and submit recommendation to Ministers by end July 2003. |
|
|
4.19 Upgrade or replace inspection and reporting software in line with SE software upgrade. |
|
|
4.20 Plan for the introduction of Electronic Records and Document Management software. |
|
|
4.21 Plan for the implementation of portal technology into the HMIE website. |
|
|
4.22 Use the SE performance management system effectively and fairly to manage and develop all HMIE staff. |
|
|
4.23 Produce and publish an Annual Report by July 2003. |
|
Strategic Priority 5
Ensure systematic quality assurance and continuous improvement within
HMIE
|
What we planned to do |
What we did |
|
5.1 Commence implementation of new structure from April: complete implementation of structure by end July 2003. |
|
|
5.2 Produce a Human Resource Strategy for HMIE by October 2003 and implement developments in recruitment. |
|
|
5.3 Work with the Quality Scotland Foundation to evaluate HMIE activities against the principles of European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM). |
|
|
5.4 Prepare for Charter Mark reassessment in 2004. |
|
|
5.5 Pursue SHAW bronze award in line with target set for wider SE. |
|
|
5.6 Carry out surveys on the views of key users on the quality of services provided. |
|
|
5.7 Carry out surveys on the views of key users on the content and structure of the new format of school inspection reports. |
|
|
5.8 Ensure that 95% of parents who respond to surveys on school inspection reports find them clear and easy to read and 95% find them helpful overall. |
|
|
5.9 Introduce a new set of post-inspection questionnaires. |
|
|
5.10 Carry out a review of community learning and development, education authority and further education inspection and review guidelines, taking account of practice in other sectors of education and of developments linked to the SE Lifelong Learning Strategy. |
|
Working with others to build capacity in the education system in Scotland and beyond
Providing professional advice to others within the UK
We continued to participate in a wide range of groups concerned with the quality assurance and improvement in education within the UK, over and above those listed against our performance measures. These include:
We have also maintained effective arrangements for liaison with other inspectorates and key players including:
The Scottish approach to quality assurance in education, and the role of HMIE within that, continued to attract significant international interest.
We participated in a number of international groups concerned with quality improvement in education including:
Throughout 2003-04 we have continued to host international visits, make presentations and provide advice on quality assurance and improvement to educationalists and Government Ministers from a number of countries including Argentina, Austria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Romania, South Africa and Sweden.
We have also undertaken a contracted review of the work of the Catholic Education Office, Sydney, Australia (ongoing) and provided quality assurance consultancy advice in South Africa.
Following two very successful training sessions for senior members of the schools inspectorate of the Czech Republic, we have been invited by them to participate in a two-year collaborative project which will see HMIE training inspectors from the Czech Republic.
In addition, we have also participated in a number of projects and conferences including:
As part of an international inspectorate task, a team of HM Inspectors carried out visits to three Scottish schools and wrote "ICT-schoolportrait" reports on each establishment which included clear insights into the management of ICT. The reports also clarified how teachers and pupils can be involved in integrating the technology to enrich learning and teaching and raise achievement.